top of page
Search

Using EAP as a Relief Channel for Workplace Bullying Complaints: Reducing the Risk of Abusive or Misguided Complaints


“Some employees appear to misunderstand the legal elements of workplace bullying. They seem to believe that as long as they feel uncomfortable, even ordinary interpersonal friction at work can become a workplace bullying complaint. This has consumed significant company resources in complaint handling and investigation. What should we do?”

This was the concern shared by the person responsible for workplace bullying complaint handling at a company with more than one thousand employees.

“Have you considered using an Employee Assistance Program, or EAP, as a channel for employees to release psychological insecurity and ease workplace interpersonal tension?” I asked.

In fact, labor regulations already provide employers with another practical tool for managing these situations.

An EAP is a comprehensive, confidential, and usually free consultation and support service provided by companies to care for employees’ physical and mental well-being.

Under Article 6, Paragraph 2 of Taiwan’s Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Ministry of Labor’s Guidelines for Preventing Unlawful Infringement in the Performance of Duties, employers may promote EAP mechanisms to provide employees with social support activities, psychological care, and counseling assistance after experiencing unlawful infringement.

The Ministry of Labor’s Guidelines for Preventing Diseases Caused by Abnormal Workload also require companies to provide work adjustments, health management, and psychological support for high-risk employees.

In addition, the Labor Health Protection Rules require employers with 50 or more employees to regularly engage occupational health service professionals, such as occupational physicians, occupational health nurses, or psychologists, depending on company size.

Article 324-3 of the Regulations for Occupational Safety and Health Facilities further provides that, to prevent workers from suffering physical or mental unlawful infringement by others in the course of performing duties, employers should, according to the complainant’s needs, provide or refer the worker to legal, medical, or psychological counseling assistance and protective measures.

These professionals play a core role in EAP systems: early case identification, health risk assessment, and professional referral.

In an era of heightened labor rights awareness, EAP is no longer merely an employee welfare program. It is one of the most effective relief channels in corporate HR risk management.

For labor law compliance training, board director continuing education programs, external panel members for workplace bullying or sexual harassment cases, and representation in litigation or mediation proceedings, please contact YesinLaw:Tel: 02-25156822Website: https://www.yesinlaw.com

1. EAP Is a Lawful Safety Valve for Occupational Safety Compliance and Workplace Bullying Prevention

The Occupational Safety and Health Act clearly requires employers to prevent workers from suffering unlawful infringement. Companies are also required to establish unlawful infringement prevention plans.

When workplace conflict occurs, employees may often experience the situation through the lens of victimization. If the company introduces EAP psychological counseling at an early stage, it can provide employees with a safe outlet for emotional distress and reduce the risk of hidden absenteeism.

At the same time, professional counseling can help employees objectively clarify the boundary between lawful management and improper conduct. This allows the company to slow down the conflict before it escalates out of control.

2. External Legal Consultation Through EAP Can Help Prevent Abusive Complaints

Some workplace complaints develop into abusive or excessive claims because employees have unrealistic expectations about the law.

Modern EAP services often include independent third-party legal consultation. When an employee threatens litigation or compensation claims, a neutral legal assessment from an external attorney may be more persuasive than an explanation from HR.

If an attorney clearly explains that the matter falls within reasonable managerial authority and that the chance of success in litigation is low, this can serve as an important reality check. It may help discourage impulsive litigation and guide the dispute back toward internal communication or mediation.

3. EAP Is a Strong Legal Shield for Employers Fulfilling Their Duty of Care

If an employee nevertheless proceeds with a labor inspection complaint or litigation, the company’s EAP support may become important defensive evidence.

When a court examines whether the employer has fulfilled its duty of care toward employee safety and health, the company may be able to show that it proactively provided EAP support at an early stage.

This may help demonstrate that the employer took reasonable preventive and supportive measures. In appropriate cases, it may reduce or mitigate the company’s potential liability for damages.

From a corporate governance perspective, EAP is therefore not only an employee benefit. It is also a key indicator of a mature and responsible risk management system.

A Reminder from Attorney Chen Yeh-Sin

Many HR teams still view EAP as a simple welfare benefit and underestimate its legal and managerial value.

In an era of increasingly strict labor regulation, companies should elevate EAP to the level of risk management.

By allowing EAP to function as a professional relief channel, companies can identify management blind spots earlier, redirect high-cost legal confrontation into lower-cost internal resolution, and reduce the risk of reputational damage that is often difficult to quantify.

Companies should therefore review their internal systems now.

If an employee experiences interpersonal conflict at work tomorrow and is on the verge of emotional breakdown, has your company already built a clear and accessible relief channel?

Is that channel truly open, trusted, and ready to function?

YesinLawTel: 02-25156822Website: https://www.yesinlaw.com

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
職場霸凌申訴案疏洪道:用EAP化解濫訴風險

「員工似乎誤解職場霸凌成立要件,以為只要他感受到不舒服,就算只是單純的職場人際關係摩擦,也動輒提出職場霸凌申訴,耗費不少公司調查程序資源,該怎麼辦?」 一位員工人數上千人的企業職場霸凌專責單位負責人員苦惱地跟我吐苦水。 「要不要考慮用員工協助方案(Employee Assistance Programs,簡稱 EAP)作為員工宣洩心裡不安全感、緩解職場人際關係摩擦的管道?」 我提醒他在勞動法規中其

 
 
 
職場霸凌申訴調查訪談時誰可以錄音?

職場霸凌申訴調查訪談時,會遇到這種兩難的局面。最常遇到的棘手狀況之一,就是當事人一進訪談室,就大剌剌地把手機或錄音筆擺在桌上,說他要錄音存證,這樣可以嗎? 反過來說,調查人員訪談時可以錄音嗎? 依職場霸凌防治準則第16條規定:訪談時應以錄音或錄影輔助並作成紀錄,但「受訪談者不得自行錄音或錄影」。 也就是說調查訪談者可以錄音甚至錄影,但禁止受訪者錄音,遑論錄影。 這個規定是為了兼顧調查程序保密與證據

 
 
 

Comments


業鑫法律事務所

地址:104 台北市中山區民生東路三段71號15樓
電話:886 2 2515 6822
傳真:886 2 2515 6833

bottom of page